Due Process

 

Home
Setting
Site Locations
Agencies
Funding Policies
Interns
Training Program
Applicant Info
Due Process
Contact Us


Due Process Procedures

The following guidelines are consistent with the general guideline described in the UT School Psychology Handbook.

Notice, Hearing and Appeal

Notice and Hearing for Probation

Grievance Procedure (Training or Supervision)

 

Notice, Hearing and Appeal

Given the amount of time and the financial and professional resources that the consortium participants invest in each intern, it is essential that the admission process select only those students who are intellectually and personally qualified to succeed. Thus, it is assumed that each student admitted to the consortium will complete it; and that consortium faculty, staff, and students are jointly responsible for maximizing the probability of attaining the goal. Ideally, at no point will the following policies need to be implemented. Realistically, in a limited number of instances, probation or termination procedures may need to be instituted. In such cases, it is assumed that all concerned, especially the intern, are fully aware of the relevant issues and of the likelihood that disciplinary action will be taken. The only time when an intern is surprised by a consortium governing board decision should be when the student has actively avoided his/her supervisors.

Notice and Hearing for Probation

Probation of an intern will be considered when a student fails to make satisfactory progress as a result of inadequacies in academic, research, ethical, or fieldwork performance. The intern's supervisor or one of the board members can make a recommendation for a probation hearing. The student will be notified in writing that the consortium governing board is considering probation. A quorum of three board members must be present in order to hear the complaint. A majority vote of the members present is required for all decisions of the board. Any board member who cannot hear the evidence fairly and objectively for any reason is obligated to dismiss himself/herself from the case. An intern who fails to appear before the board in accordance with proper notification shall be deemed to have waived his/her rights to be present during the presentation and to present information in his/her own behalf.

Interns placed on probation will be notified in writing as to both the probationary period and the specific steps that must be taken for its termination. Identified deficits must be made up before a student can be removed from probation. Should this occur prior to the end of the probationary period, the intern may petition the governing board to be removed from probation.

Notice, Hearing and Appeal for Termination

Termination of an intern will be considered when (1) the intern fails to meet the conditions established by the governing board at the time of the initial probation decision or (2) an intern not on probation breeches legal or ethical conduct in his/her collegiate, personal, or professional behavior. The student will be notified in writing that the consortium governing board is considering termination. A quorum of three board members must be present in order to hear the charges. A majority vote of the members present is required for all decisions of the board. Any board member who cannot hear the evidence fairly and objectively for any reason is obligated to dismiss himself/herself from the case. An intern who fails to appear before the board in accordance with proper notification shall be deemed to have waived his/her rights to be present during the presentation and to present evidence in person to his/her supervisors, or any member of the consortium staff. At the determination of the consortium's governing board, the violation may be outlined with a written request for corrective action or the intern may be terminated. Violation of legal, ethical, personal or professional behavior deemed flagrant without corrective recourse will result in the governing Board's recommendation for immediate termination. Ignorance of ethical and legal standards does not constitute extenuating circumstances. If the members of the governing board vote to terminate the intern, a recommendation to that effect will be conveyed to the intern and a notice sent to the intern's training program.

When an Intern is being considered for termination due to any one of the following events: (1) a material breech of the contract with the consortium; (2) conviction of intern of a felony or exclusion from participating in any federal healthcare; (3) failure of the intern to comply with any other rules and regulations established by federal and state government agencies, the intern will be immediately suspended, with pay, from working until the governing board has made a ruling on the issues.

The disciplinary action of the governing board may be appealed. In all cases,the request for appeal must be submitted in writing to the director of training within seven (7) calendar days of written notice of the board decision. If the seventh day falls on a weekend or holiday, the time is extended to the next regular workday. All appeals must be taken upon the record made before the original board. Pending the outcome of an appeal, termination will not be imposed. The director of training will form an appellate board of three members of licensed psychologists from the community. The intern has a right to refuse a member for cause. A majority vote of the members present is required for all decisions of the board. Any board member who cannot hear the evidence fairly and objectively for any reason is obligated to dismiss himself/herself from the case. The appellate board will review the request for appeal together with any written briefs or other supporting documents to determine if the appeal presents a substantial question within the scope of review. The scope of review shall be limited to the following:

Appropriateness of Termination: In cases appealing the appropriateness of termination, the appeal board shall uphold termination unless termination is shown to be clearly unreasonable (i.e., that which has been clearly and fully proven to have no sound basis or justification in reason).

New Evidence: In cases appealed on grounds of new evidence, the moving party must show that such evidence could not have been discovered by due diligence prior to the original hearing.

Due Process: In cases appealed on the grounds of denial of due process, the moving party must show that the adjudicatory process of the initial hearing was not conducted in conformity with properly prescribed procedures.

Grievance Procedure (Training or Supervision)

 An intern has the right to file a grievance by presenting concerns in written form to the governing Board. The board will respond in writing to the concern within a 30-day period.

The intern may appeal the board's decision by so notifying the Board in writing within a 15-day period. Upon receiving the written appeal, the board will notify the director of The University of Tennessee School Psychology Training Program. The UT Director will appoint a three member committee to review the appeal. The committee members will be selected from members of the University School Psychology Training Program. The co-chairs are nonvoting members of the committee. The appeal committee shall make a ruling on the appeals within 30 days of the consortium's receiving the written appeal from the intern. Decisions of the appeal committee shall be considered final by all parties involved.

While an intern may file a grievance at any time, it is anticipated that complaints and grievances about training components will be brought to the attention of the direct supervisor, the group supervision supervisor, one of the co-chairs of the consortium, or the training director and successfully resolved.

back to top